CryptoWeeklies / Reports / LIN
Linde (LIN) research
Every model we publish for Linde — valuation, risk and forecast — regenerated daily from market data. Free, no account.
Linde key levels today
The headline figure from each of Linde's reports, as published today. Each comes from the report linked beside it.
| 200-week TWAP | $428.63 | TWAP / Gravity Risk |
| Gravity Risk (0-100) | 35.8 | TWAP / Gravity Risk |
| 200-week moving average | $429.25 | 200-Week Moving Average Risk |
| Accumulation line (-1σ) | $470.36 | Valuation Bands |
| Valuation-band fair value | $494.80 | Valuation Bands |
| Distribution line (+1σ) | $520.52 | Valuation Bands |
| Detected market phase | Extreme Bubble (+2σ) | Valuation Bands |
| Moving-average risk score | 82.7% | 200-Week Moving Average Risk |
| Forecast base target | $546.71 (68% range $496.38 to $597.12) | Price Forecast |
Is Linde overvalued right now?
Linde trades 22% above its 200-week Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP), with a Gravity Risk score of 35.8/100.
Where is Linde against its 200-week moving average?
Linde is 21.4% above its 200-week moving average of $429.25, at $521.08. Macro risk score 82.7%.
What are Linde's fair value, floor and ceiling?
Linde fair value $494.80; the phase detector reads Extreme Bubble (+2σ), 67.0% through the phase.
What does the model forecast for the Linde price?
Linde model base target $546.71 by May 16, 2027, with a 68% range of $496.38 to $597.12.
How does Linde's reading today compare with its own history?
Across the 45 daily readings published from 2026-09-04 to 2026-11-09, Linde's moving-average risk score ranged from 42.2 to 82.7 (82.7 today) and its phase completion ranged from 27.5% to 67% (67% today).
How does Linde's Gravity Risk compare with other quantum computing stocks?
Linde's Gravity Risk of 35.8 is the 5th highest of the 10 quantum computing stocks we track, against a median of 29.8. The lowest reading today is Rigetti Computing at 14.8 and the highest is Arqit Quantum at 58.8. By premium to its 200-week TWAP, 22% above, it is the 4th lowest of the 10, against a median of 28% above.